Existence exists, or it wouldn't.
scerir wrote:
> Skye wrote:
> ... there's no possible way to tell the difference
> between a reality which is reasonable and logical
> and self contained/consistent constructed as
> a necessity within an infinite scope of variety,
> and a world that exists because it is reasonable
> and self-consistent and follows the rules of
> formal reasoning.
>
> Something else mr. Berry (and sir Russell,
> and prof. Chaitin) cooked up.
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/unm2.html
> and also
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/vienna.html
>
> But "ex contradictione quodlibet" (ancient romans used
> to say) is also the essential principle of *paraconsistency*
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/
Everything is basically real.
Mathematics is a very wide subject. I like to follow it because it
helps me understand how something would happen. I don't know much about
the intricacies of the regular polygons.
I have read some Russell and some other math books. I read the sci.math
and sci.logic groups sometimes to learn more.
Ross
-- Ross Andrew Finlayson Finlayson Consulting Ross at Tiki-Lounge: http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~raf/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:30 MDT