[Still catching up -- only two weeks behind now . . .]
In a message dated 10/4/00 10:03:07 AM Central Daylight Time,
> Nazis: Europe/world united under the leadership of a German,
> racial-nationalist one-party state, with corporatist, but nonetheless
> privately owned, economy.
> Communists: World united under a set of one-party communist states with
> state-owned industry
> Social democracy: Independent multi-party, democratic countries with mixed
> Anyone who tries to tell you these three social systems were basically same
> thing because they weren't anarcho-capitalism isn't contributing
> meaningfully to the conversation.
I agree with you on this, Mr. Hughes. Extremist rhetoric bothers me, even
(perhaps especially) libertarian extremist rhetoric. I agree that really
equating Germany in the 1930s or Russia in the 1950s with, say, Sweden in the
1970s or 80s doesn't move the dialogue along. On the other hand, I don't
know how anyone could maintain that, say, Sweden in the 1970s or 80s had
achieved some insurmountable zenith of perfection in the arrangement of human
affairs. (I'm picking Sweden for my own rhetorical purposes :-).
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<firstname.lastname@example.org>
Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
ICQ # 61112550
"We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
-- Desmond Morris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:17 MDT