Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:50:10 MDT

Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Stockholm Syndrome Info"
Previous message: John Clark: "Re: PI in the Bible"
In reply to: Dan Fabulich: "Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Reply: Frank Prengel: "RE: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dan Fabulich writes:

> Save this file as a .ps file and run ps2pdf on it, which comes with
> Ghostscript.

Sounds like a recipe to get huge files. Rather use native .pdf export
capacities.

Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: Stockholm Syndrome Info"
Previous message: John Clark: "Re: PI in the Bible"
In reply to: Dan Fabulich: "Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Next in thread: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Reply: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Reply: Frank Prengel: "RE: PPT vs PDF :) (was: RE: Burning the Cosmic Commons Talk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:17 MDT