>From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: Politics & Culture: Paglia Goes Green!
>Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:49:11 -0400
>Natasha Vita-More wrote:
> > The recent article by Camille Paglia on Salon.com is titled "Of dubious
> > debates, kisses and divas"
> > Pagalia, whose journalistic style is if full of history, mythology,
> > taboos, cross-gender insight and obstreperous political blasting, claims
> > that she will be voing Green in this years' election.
>Having read a bunch of her stuff, I don't see how she can honestly vote
>way, unless she is taking my advice to campaign for Nader, vote for Bush.
I saw a documentary on Paglia and thought she had an interesting thought
proccess. I looked up some of her stuff on the web and didn't take long to
conclude that she is just plain fucked up.
Here's an example:
"As far as Ginsberg's pro-NAMBLA stand goes, this is one of the things I
most admire him for. I have repeatedly protested the lynch-mob hysteria that
dogs the issue of man-boy love. In "Sexual Personae," I argued that male
pedophilia is intricately intertwined with the cardinal moments of Western
I wouldn't be surprised if she dumped Nader tommorow to support David Duke
as president, then dumped him the next day to supprt Ronald McDonald.
Not to completely dismiss her. There are a lot of just-plain-fucked-up
people who end up stumbling upon a truth once in a while. And like I said,
her thought proccess is interesting.
Zeb Haradon (email@example.com)
My personal webpage:
A movie I'm directing:
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:17 MDT