"Michael S. Lorrey" wrote:
> Its a matter of what is the greater threat versus lesser evil. Gore has a far
> better chance of being elected than Browne, and the more that vote for Browne
> instead of Bush increases Gore's chances. Gore is the one we definitely don't
> want in office for any reason. To maximize the odds of Gore losing, I am
> campaigning for Nader, and voting for Bush.
But don't you see that many of us want neither Tweedledum nor Tweedledee
and are tired of these lesser-of-two-evils games as both evils are
utterly intolerable? I would rather see millions make their fed-upness
known by voting for Browne than see them driven into further apathy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:16 MDT