Eugene Leitl wrote:
>I do think that the consensus is that to want to live is not evil, and
>by exclusion things which terminate an enjoyable existance to be
>evil. Quite axiomatic, or so I have thought.
If one thing must die for another to be born, then it is not obvious
which to prefer.
>There's a difference. Our children won't eat us, AIs possibly
>could. (Would you be nice to Giger's alien?) If AIs grow slow, there
>would be sense for them to reciprocate us being nice to them. If they
>grow fast, we're just reabsorbable scaffold. Until we know for sure
>which bootstrap kinetics will occur I recommend caution.
Hard to argue against caution - so sure, let's be cautious. And I
do believe that AIs will grow slow enough to learn to reciprocate.
Robin Hanson firstname.lastname@example.org http://hanson.gmu.edu
Asst. Prof. Economics, George Mason University
MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444
703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:16 MDT