At 01:51 AM 7/10/00 -0700, Daniel Ust wrote:
>since we know Mach is wrong, the conclusion does not follow.
What *is* the origin of inertia, then? [Any mention of zero-point EM fields
earns instant disqualification]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:15 MDT