>I think you have to distinguish between Capitalism at the Macro
>level and at the level of the individual businessman.
I'm trying to distinguish between capitalism, a form of economics,
and the actions of greedy or unscrupulous persons.
>In a capitalist society with a capitalist government no one except
>the government is allowed to initiate the use of force and that
>against only the invader and the criminal after due process.
This is confusing economics with politics again. How or why to use
force has nothing to do with capitalism.
>But nothing in that process says that the individual businessman
>has to be a capitalist in personal philosophy. That individual
>could possibly be member of a number of personal philosophies but
>if they can not get away with using force, coercion or deceit the
>only tools left to them is free trade.
Capitalism isn't a philosophy, it's a type of economics. My point
is that many traits of individuals are erroneously accredited to
>Personally I have worked for individual businessmen that were
>complete scoundrels personally but could not effectively get away
>with that behavior given our laws and courts. He made a business
>of contracting for work and his best workers knowing him would
>demand, and got, pay in advance before they would go to the job.
>The man was still operating as a capitalist even though he really
>didn't want to - he couldn't get away with anything else.
This person may be a capitalist by default, but he/she is also
dishonest, and a scoundrel.
Many people seem to think capitalism implies a certain set of moral
or ethical values (or it should). It does not.
Scoundrels can also be capitalists, so can dictators.
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Mars Society, www.marssociety.org
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:15 MDT