In a message dated 99-09-20 01:25:14 EDT, email@example.com (Kathryn Aegis) wrote:
> Interesting. The original scenario did not account for the long line of
My pessimism in response to Anders' post was based on the scenario's assumption that it was very difficult to determine who had been infected and the widespread belief that many people had been infected. In this situation, I don't know how any NON-INFECTED person could trust the existing constitutional mechanism of succesion.
Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<firstname.lastname@example.org> Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide http://users.aol.com/gburch1 -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1 "Civilization is protest against nature; progress requires us to take control of evolution." Thomas Huxley