At 10:49 AM 9/9/99 -0400, Robin Hanson wrote:
>Regarding who started the fire, I'm less sure.
>I'd want to study the tape Ian gives clips of in more
>detail to be as sure as he seems to be. But given
>that the FBI has lied about at least two things,
>Ian's claim is (in this case) quite plausible.
IAN: It's not just my opinion that the
hot-spot in question is something outside
the window and thus on the wall where it
appears. Such is indicated in "Waco: The
Rules of Engagement," it is believed by
the Davidian's defense team, and by FLIR
expert Dr. Edward Allard, as I note in my
report with link to his testimony. Also,
the government's own Fire Report states
that that hot-spot is the origin of the
fire. So this raises the question: Why
is the origin of the fire some static
heat source fixed on the outside wall?
The Govt alleges that the hot-spot is
a fire inside the room seen through the window, but as we can see even in the
reduced image at my site, it's just
above the window, not within it.
Thanks for sharing your commentary on
W:ROE, I agree with it. The gun shots
are unmistakable, and, as Dr. Allard
and other FLIR experts stipulate,
they cannot be explained by any other
phenomena but the muzzle flashes of guns; and they're directed towards the building. This supports no other conclusion than
that mass murder was the Govt's intent. McNulty's new documentary will also show video of a helicopter around back shooting down at the building on the last day. These are the actions of the same Organized Mob that many want all guns surrendered to!
If Columbine means The People should be
disarmed, what does the planned slaughter
at Waco mean? I guess we should believe it
means that only the Govt should have guns.
Why would anyone want us to surrender our
defenses to an entity that perpetrates
mass murder in the U.S. and abroad??!
I'd not want that for my worst enemy.
Seems clear to me that The People are
defined as "the enemy" by their Govt.
This doesn't bode well for the future!