[....]
> If we knew with a high degree of probability that the research
> was going to pay off within, say, ten years, then many people
> would decide doing CR now wouldn't be worth it (though the
> disease-prevention effect might motivate some to stay on it
> until the pill is available). The reasoning might be: "Yes, it
> means losing ~1-2 years as a result of five years of non-CR,
> but, starting in 2009 [....]
Minor correction.
I'm aware the current year isn't yet 2004. Should be:
> until the pill is available). The reasoning
> might be: "Yes, it means losing ~2-4 years
> as a result of ten years of non-CR,
> but, starting in 2009, [....]
Changed my ex. mid-stream without changing the other numbers. Sorry, hungover. (One of the many drawbacks to CR: can't hold your booze as easily.)
fizzzzzz......
Brian.
> --
> Brian Manning Delaney
> <b-delaney@uchicago.edu>
> (No need to CC replies to me.)