Re: ANTIMatter?

Michael S. Lorrey (retroman@turbont.net)
Wed, 01 Sep 1999 20:52:22 -0400

Matt Gingell wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sun Leegba Love <kyberlove@hotmail.com>
> To: <extropians@extropy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 6:42 PM
> Subject: Re: ANTIMatter?
>
> >
> >At some current density,
> >I believe you setup a magnetic field that disrupts Acceptance of
> >timeinfusedSpace
> >natural space materializes as property
> >KON ZEN THINK superconductivity. a problem
> >of what thoughts create
> >with the material FORMsimply staying together
> >the highest-field magnets HAVETRANS would presumably apply to KERNEL
> >STRUCTURE-INSIDE as well as you keep SPIRITHEALINGSCIENCE you increasing the
> >field density.
> >I believe you setup timeSPACE ANTIMatter LAW Energy #1
> >HAVETRANS would presumably apply a magnetic field that disrupts material
> >properties
> >
> >timeinfusedSpace
> >Acceptance of natural space
> >?
> >of what thoughts create
> >
> >SLL
>
> Oh please, this is nothing new. I've been debunking this nonsense since the
> sixties. See "Where My Bitches At? : The Matt Gingell Story" (MIT Press 1967)
>
> -matt

I always am WEARY of email MESSAGES that have more than one out of every ten words CAPITALIZED...I am GIVEN to understand that THIS is a sign of an UNBALANCED mind....

MIKE lorrey