Re: Female genetics & Longevity [was Re: Twin Studies]

phil osborn (philosborn@hotmail.com)
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:00:39 PDT

>From: "Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@www.aeiveos.com>
>Reply-To: extropians@extropy.com
>To: extropians@extropy.com
>Subject: Female genetics & Longevity [was Re: Twin Studies]

>
>So recontextualizing, the "progressive, anti-futurist" argument --
>these women are simply fighting (tooth and nail) for the survival
>of their genetic design function -- to bear offspring.
>
>Robert
>
I also ran into this when the news first came out that serious scientists felt that there was no inherent major difficulty in having men bear children. The immediate response that I got from several women to whom I casually broached the idea: "But then what would be left for women to do?"



Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com