At the risk of wasting yet more bandwith on a tertiary issue, I should mention that I did not intend to denigrate the recent science on mating, sex, or whatever the issue was on the female/genetics thread. There is some good research (finally) being done, although some of it does reveal some cultural bias and should be read with that in mind.
The main issue, as far as I can tell from the mail I got, is that 'the mysterious female' was being discussed as if we were some separate species, and not even present on the lists. Pretty foul, from what little I saw.
Guys, get over it, ok? Let's move on to more important issues, like getting more 'dangers' listed so that Waldemar can write a coherent essay on this for THE TRANSHUMANIST.
Kathryn Aegis