Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
> [Anarchic Child Welfare]
> > As I recently said, "The solution would be corporate sponsorship."
> But Bryan, advertising doesn't work if you have the lifestyle
> of a plant!
No advertising. Big business buys a chunk of the child, contributes education, housing, clothing, food, et cetera, and then when the child is ready to specialise they're either traded to a company in that area, or trained up and then traded.
> [In nanotopia] Corporations will only be selling to the rich people, who
> want a non-open source design for the prestige factor.
Post-drextech we might be able to feasibly start a social anarchy, I can't see much need for money.