Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
> But we can *build* a car that runs on water. Put the water in the
In this example Robert, the car "runs" on solar cells. The water
just serves as a [somewhat inefficient] means of power transmission.
Many people have the notion that water can somehow be used as a fuel.
> tank, let the solar cells turn it into H2, run the H2 into a fuel
> cell and then drive off.
> The problem isn't with the science, it is with the unflexible
> manufacturing infrastructure.
Or a lawsuit lottery legal system. See my previous post. {8-] spike