At 05:43 PM 7/6/99 PDT, Robert wrote:
>It would be more useful (IMHO), to differentiate between
>"created" memes and "inherited" memes. Inherited memes
>(male or female) are the result of a natural selection
>"agenda" which we have never (historically) influenced.
>
>A more fundamental question becomes whether males *and*
>females can divorce themselves from their non-chosen
>genetic programs and write their own script or whether
>we will remain shadows or offspring of those unconsciously
>derived agendas?
>
>A few years ago, I seem to recall an article about a
>scientist discovering a branch of fungi which had
>a dozen or more "sexes".
>
>Why do we have to confine ourselves to perspectives
>"tainted" by the genetic tree we happen to currently
>be in?
Thanks Robert, I agree with you.
My initial comment was based on the fact that I grow not only tired, but
weary of historical accounts focusing on any one type of thinking and/or
contribution to cultural advances. I think it is important to recognize
that ideas within the culture stem from many sources. Some of these
sources are more subtle than others, yet just as poignant. Ignoring this
is not a fair and complete account of our branching tree, nor its roots.
I'm more interested in the quality and "rounded" (no pun intended)
influence of meme breeders. By rounded I am referring to the scope of the
breeder and all the areas of thought and ideas that affect our lives.
Natasha Vita-More: http://www.natasha.cc Transhumanist Art Centre - Home of Extropic Art: http://www.extropic-art.com **NEW** Transhuman Culture InfoMark: http://www.transhuman.org PRESS RELEASE: "We are transhumans ..." Meme Orbits Saturn in 2004!
Biotech Futures: Challenges of Life Extension and Genetic Engineering
http://www.extropy.org/ex4/e4main.htm