Ian Goddard wrote:
> At 01:39 PM 9/25/98 -0400, Doug Bailey wrote:
> >Ian Goddard wrote:
> >> The analysis of synthetic numeric identities here-
> >> in allows us to see and thereby prove: (a) that
> >> identity is conserved, expressed via the real num-
> >> bers as a constant zero-sum, since, for example, n
> >> is always as much more than x as x is less than n;
> >> (b) that identity is therefore symmetrical; (c)
> >> that Relative identity is holistic, since all non-
> >> zero identity attributes are derived from other-
> >> difference; and (d) that the Absolute (nonrelative)
> >> identity of each and every thing equals zero.
> >I guess at this point I am wondering what kind of useful insights can
> >be drawn from the conclusions above. I can not find any. I'd rather
> >identify to what end such a conclusion might contribute before
> >wondering whether it is valid.
> IAN: For starters, union of previously assumed to
> be paradoxically related, or contrary, philosophies:
YAYA: While this essay clearly proves IAN GODDARD = 0, in Egyptian mirror mathematics there is no zero, which might explain why cats are psychic.