James Wilson wrote:
> Dear Mr. Nicoletti and Mr. Long,
Well, I ain't them, but that's part of my reason for replying.
> Attached is an example of spam which I have been receiving from your
> network. When I inquired in the anti-spam community the general
> response was that direct1.net was a spam-happy spamhaus which allows
> its customers to steal computer services from innocent netizens. Not
While I disagree that spam is theft, *if* it is theft, then how are you any different?