In a message dated 7/16/98 1:36:15 PM Central Daylight Time, rcs@CS.Arizona.EDU writes:
> > I would add one more data point to "we're in for a cosmological > revolution":
This brings up a point that I'm curious about. I'd be interested in an evaluation of the paper at.
http://homepages.force9.net/calresco/cosmic.htm
by any on this list who are knowledgable in this field. Also...is this SITE credible?
Some of the things that have my attention are....
>>c) The Universe is no more than 20 Billion years old
>>Galactic clusters have been discovered that could not gravitationally have
evolved to the >>state they are in now in less than 100 Billion years,
contradicting the theory.
and
>>i) Standard Model predicts abundant magnetic monopoles - not one has been
found >>experimentally.
>>j) General relativity suggests curvatures of the universe 60 orders of
magnitude greater >>than those seen.
There are other sites which continue in the same vein.
http://members.xoom.com/spacetheory/
Being one.
EvMick