>With a Darwinian Economy I meant an economy without any ethical rules or
>law-enforcing organisation (like a state). I'm not saying it won't work, I
>think it would work very well (that was what the post was all about). But I
>find the side-effect of such a system much too high.
Oh. Then what you have mentioned is an impossibility at present. All humans
operate by ethical rules, albeit generally unconcious ones. Any society thus
reflects the ethical rules of its human members. Yes, the side effects of a
society without humans could be quite bad (or good, depending on the
components).