> Someone has proposed a scale of scientific credibility:
>
> > 10.0 Richard Feynman, Niels Bohr: The standards.
> > 9.0 Albert Einstein, Steven Hawking: No experiments, no 10.
> > 8.0 ?
> > 7.0 Carl Sagan: [...]
> > 6.0 ?
> > 5.0 Andrew Weil: [...]
> > 4.0 Hal Puthoff, Fleischman & Pons: [...]
> > 3.0 ?
> > 2.0 John Gray (Mars/Venus): Interesting ideas, thin on facts.
> > 1.0 ?
> > 0.0 L. Ron Hubbard, Creationists, Astrologers.
>
> The cosmetic ".0" suggests a crackpot who confuses precision with accuracy.
Hmm, how do one use the scale? By voting about it, or are there some
absolute standards (number of proven correct claims/total number of
claims)?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
nv91-asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~nv91-asa/main.html
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y