>Check it out. He's a good writer, and he is coherent - he doesn't
>babble, and he really makes an effort to be clear and precise. If he's
>mad he's mad in a really interesting way, not a boring way like the
I spent some time on his mailing list last year; he seems like a loon to
me, or at least to loudly ignore any evidence against his theories (the
few people who openly questioned the theories on the list soon gave up and
left). In fact the general list philosophy seemed to be taking 'intution'
over evidence and ranting against scientists.