> I will freely admit that my understanding of corporate law is limited.
> My basic contention is that a group of individuals (the owners and
> operators) under the umbrella of "INC." should not have any more rights,
> privileges or protections than any other group of free-associating
> individuals. The way I understand things now, this is not the case. Is
> this correct?
Yes. But I have to ask, why would you rather sue an employee of a
corporation when you can sue the corporation itself? Go for the deepest
pockets man.