Re: Robert Anton Wilson

Mark Grant (mark@unicorn.com)
Wed, 9 Jul 1997 10:42:41 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Fermi's Paradox, again"
Previous message: Hagbard Celine: "Re: GUNS: Defensive Use"
Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "Robert Anton Wilson"
Next in thread: Mark Grant: "Sagan, Velikovsky and *mail problems*"

Hal Finney (hal@rain.org) wrote:
>I'm not familiar with the details of this controversy, but I can read
>what is written above. Sagan is not claiming to have predicted high
>temperatures. He is taking credit for offering a specific explanation
>of the high temperatures, namely that they were caused by a runaway
>greenhouse effect. Wilson is wrong to say that Sagan is claiming that
>he originated the prediction that Venus would have high temperatures.

Hmm, good point. I'll see if I can access the other Web pages today and
find the stuff I was originally looking for.

Mark

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Fermi's Paradox, again"
Previous message: Hagbard Celine: "Re: GUNS: Defensive Use"
Maybe in reply to: John K Clark: "Robert Anton Wilson"
Next in thread: Mark Grant: "Sagan, Velikovsky and *mail problems*"