>some kind. I am attempting to understand it myself. Yet, I do know that
>the break(la brisure) is absolutely essential as an axiomatic of
>capitalism,
I can't quite fathom this. I thought I understood capitalism fairly well,
but perhaps an axiom has escaped me... as the "category notion" is/was
axiomatic but unnoticed in philosophy for millennia.
> and that it operates from within dialogues such as these,
>and
>also from within larger social contexts, and is not necessarily "the
>pause that refreshes." This concept is closely akin to another: that
>surplus value cannot be determined mathematically.<Nomadthought@usa.net>
(perplexity) One can argue that *value* cannot be determined mathematically.
Many have. I don't want to accuse you of dazzlement, but I hope you
won't mind "unpacking" your speech a bit. A discontinuity takes place
across a zero (or arbitrarily small) interval; I see nothing "pause"-like
about it unless you "cheat" and swap axes. But maybe "brisure" isn't
"discontinuity". I'm also completely unfamiliar with whatever connotative
baggage "brisure" carries with it in French...
MMB
BOUNCE WARNING: A simple reply to the above address will fail. If you wish
to send me a _noncommercial_ message, kindly substitute a hyphen for the
asterisk.