Re: Look backwards for safety

From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2001 - 22:00:07 MDT

Next message: John Grigg: "language taken too literally... LOL!"
Previous message: John Grigg: "Re: first line of defense"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Look backwards for safety"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Look backwards for safety"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Look backwards for safety"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "More on motion sickness, was Re: Look backwards for safety"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael M. Butler <butler@comp-lib.org> Wrote:

> Yep. The tradeoff is that many more passengers would get motion sick.

Why?

Next message: John Grigg: "language taken too literally... LOL!"
Previous message: John Grigg: "Re: first line of defense"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Look backwards for safety"
Next in thread: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Look backwards for safety"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Look backwards for safety"
Reply: Michael M. Butler: "More on motion sickness, was Re: Look backwards for safety"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:41:00 MDT