On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:02:56AM -0700, hal@finney.org wrote:
>
> Please, let's cut back on the forwards and include more original thought
> and analysis from a uniquely Extropian perspective.
I second that. While there is a social component of this list, and rumor
spreading is a popular higher primate pastime, we risk losing the
extropian part under the barrage of other quoted views.
I suggest that everybody think *carefully* the next time you are about
to post something about what the extropian relevance is. If it has no
relevance, drop the post. If it has a slight relevance, adapt the post
so that it is more relevant. One way of making posts more relevant is
to do a bit more than just quoting others; try to check the sources and
add an analysis from an extropian perspective.
(Extropian relevance of this post: 1) trying to improve communication
and discursive growth 2) pointing out the need for better epistemology
among humans and suggesting a very partial solution)
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:57 MDT