Here's something else on this:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfram/210901/dlfor54.asp
BD
---- "Michael M. Butler" <butler@comp-lib.org> wrote:
> It's only "China" because the Chinese would like to claim it as their
> territory--
> they might have done so, I don't recall.
>
> Rather like the Hindu Kush--three countries, no waiting.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Bin Laden heads for China
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:33:43 +0100
> From: "steve" <steve365@btinternet.com>
> Reply-To: extropians@extropy.org
> To: <extropians@extropy.org>
> References: <CPEJKGJHDIBPPGBDFCEBCEGCCFAA.seankenny@blueyonder.co.uk>
>
> I think it's very unlikely the Chinese would take him. The place mentioned
> is the ling narrow bit of land at the extreme east end of Afghanistan.
> As
> well as bordering on China it also gives access to Pakistan and Tadjikistan>
> It's remote, very hard to get to in numbers but with various escape
> routes
> out for a small group - logical really. Steve Davies
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Kenny" <seankenny@blueyonder.co.uk>
> To: "Extropians List" <extropians@extropy.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:09 PM
> Subject: Bin Laden heads for China
>
>
> > Haven't seen this anywhere yet - don't know how reliable source is,
> but
> all
> > I can think is "Oh Shit!"
> >
> > http://frontierpost.com.pk/main.asp?id=2&date1=9/21/2001
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
__________________________________________________
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:54 MDT