Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over

From: Bryan Moss (bryan.moss@btinternet.com)
Date: Sat Sep 15 2001 - 16:25:13 MDT

Next message: Sean Kenny: "RE: Sleepers, a possible solution."
Previous message: Mark Walker: "Re: TERRORISM: Seriousness and potential strategies"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over"
Next in thread: Party of Citizens: "Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over"
Reply: Party of Citizens: "Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Robert J. Bradbury wrote:

> How do we know what we know?

We have yet to refute it.

> How do we value one collection of bits above another?

The more refutable - i.e., brittle - the better.

This is simple, albeit disputed, stuff.

Next message: Sean Kenny: "RE: Sleepers, a possible solution."
Previous message: Mark Walker: "Re: TERRORISM: Seriousness and potential strategies"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over"
Next in thread: Party of Citizens: "Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over"
Reply: Party of Citizens: "Re: Hawking misquoted on computers taking over"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:47 MDT