Michael Wiik wrote:
>
> "Russell Blackford" <RussellBlackford@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > <plonk>
> and Samantha Atkins <samantha@objectent.com> responded:
> > go *plonk* yourself.
>
> This is the way the world ends, plonk by plonk.
>
> Theoretical exercise: How many intelligence agents would it take to
> disrupt any politically active mailing list? My theory is only one agent
> is required, regardless of the size of the list.
>
> No doubt list literalists here will think I'm accusing one or both of
> these people of being intelligence agents, which I'm not. Hopefully such
> would be more subtle than 'plonk'. (I suspect Joe Dees :-)
>
Agreed. I was surprised by a *plonk* over what amounted to a
misunderstanding and more than a bit ticked off by such. There
aren't enough of us to casually quit talking to each other.
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:27 MDT