>From: "Harvey Newstrom" <mail@HarveyNewstrom.com>
>For those who haven't met him, Louis is my brother. We are
>identical mirror twins, but don't make the mistake of assuming
>that we probably have the same politics or attitudes. Despite
>some of the discussions around here, genetics don't dictate
>everything.
Judging from his first post, I like him already. ;)
>My point was that hate-crime laws are not equal-rights laws. They
>do not give extra positive things to minorities. Instead, they
>give extra negative things to criminals. It would be more direct
>to argue whether criminals deserve these harsher sentences rather
>then to argue whether minorities deserve the "perks".
Hate crime laws are not equal-rights laws, they are special
treatment laws, or extra-rights laws.
>The original comment I was referencing claimed that hate crimes
>laws equaled extra rights for gays or blacks. Hate-crime laws
>were raised as an example of how gays are getting more rights than
>straights under equal-rights laws. My point was that these are not
>equal rights laws, they are tougher sentencing laws. They do not
>give anything to gays or blacks. They give something (negative)
>to convicted criminals.
They are extra rights, not equal rights, those who attack the
subjects of hate crime laws receive extra punishment.
If there not extra, get rid of them.
Brian
Member:
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
SBC/Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
Disclosure notice: currently "plonked"
"Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
"Party of Citizens"<citizens@vcn.bc.ca>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:21 MDT