Mike Lorrey wrote,
> Considering your earlier predeliction toward judging the information by
> judging the source, Harvey, why don't you apply that same sort of bias
> against this article's claims, since it's published on an anti-GMO
> luddite website that, according to my browsing, embraces all sorts of
> unscientific opinions and issues that depend upon religious faith.
Mike, let's not get into a long conversation about this one. I think you
are wrong that this particular article is religiously based. However, I
will concede to a broader issue you are implying.
I admit that I have a Liberal background and a clear Liberal bias. Although
I try to keep it under control, I do jump on conservative-based fallacies
more than I jump on liberal-based fallacies. I do not use an even hand on
both sides of the fence.
Whenever I apply myself to a particular issue, I like to think I am
scientific and fair. However I fully admit that I do not apply myself as
often or as long toward some causes as with others. This doesn't mean that
I don't think they deserve as much support, but I allow my pet peeves to
grab more of my attention than other deserving issues.
-- Harvey Newstrom <http://HarveyNewstrom.com> <http://Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:12 MDT