>From: "Harvey Newstrom" <mail@HarveyNewstrom.com>
>Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote,
> > That said, their AI theory most certainly appears to suck, and I would
>put
> > their chance of passing the Turing test in ten years at zero, unless the
> > organization shifts to a completely new theory. My guess is that the
> > incoherent babblings they've achieved are every bit as dumb as they
> > appear, and not simple cases of something that could scale up to greater
> > complexity.
>
>I was disturbed by their examples, as well. They claimed that they were
>nonsensical in the sense of a child's ramblings. That did not appear to me
>to be the case. Children do not randomly make non sequitur. They play
>games, have imaginary friends, and change topics frequently. But they do
>not accidentally pull up the wrong information from their brain and spew it
>out in answer to the wrong question. I also didn't understand the concept
>of the computer wanting bananas on a trip. Unless this is an android that
>simulates eating and has taste sensors, this is meaningless. How did the
>computer "learn" to "like" bananas? If it can't eat, how does it "like"
>them. This does not compare to a child who likes bananas. I found the
>examples to be more counter-examples of AI. (Unfortunately!)
The impression I got was that it wanted to take bananas for the monkeys,
because it had learned that monkeys like bananas. I could be wrong tho.
-Zero
"I'm a seeker too. But my dreams aren't like yours. I can't help thinking
that somewhere in the universe there has to be something better than man.
Has to be." -- George Taylor _Planet of the Apes_ (1968)
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:12 MDT