Joe Dees wrote:
> >
> I was referring to the period, short as it was, BETWEEN the fall of Yugoslavian communism and the rise of Serbian fascism. That was the only period that Sarajevo WASN'T under one bootheel or another, and it was when its inhabitants were most free to pe
acefully simultaneously celebrate their ethnic diversity and their citizen-of-Sarajevo solidarity. It's called E Pluribus Unum, and wherever it happens, it's a GOOD thing.
And JUST how long did this period last, Joe? It never did. Any
examination of Yugoslavian history for the last 15 years will find that
Milosevic was hyping his serbian fascism prior to the breakup of the
Warsaw Pact, and prior to the breakup of the Yugoslav state with the
secession of Slovenia and Croatia. You can find in the news archives
that in the late 1980's, Milosevic made a speech in Kosovo inimating his
Serbian nationalism, that he would stop the growing influence of
Albanians in Kosovo.
Once again, Joe, you are quite wrong.
> One way to tell social liberals and social conservatives apart, even when one or both claim to be libertarian, is that the social liberals don't hate/fear the word 'different' and worship the word 'similar'. In fact, the so-called 'rugged individualist
s' of the Reagan era were among the mosy monochromatic clones I can recall; the real individuals are the ones they despised because of their diversity and multi(ple)culure(alism).
Once again, you show your true colors, Joe. Demonizing, again, your
opponents.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:40:07 MDT