Re: Olber again (was: Re: Big Bang is Bunk)

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@datamann.com)
Date: Mon Jul 30 2001 - 14:36:40 MDT


1.5DD23F50@datamann.com> <20010730193428.A2235@akira.nada.kth.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Anders Sandberg wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Mike Lorrey wrote:
> >
> > If the universe is already infinite, how could it be expanding? If it is
> > expanding, how could it be called a 'steady state'?
>
> You can have an expanding steady state. Just imagine an infinite plane
> which is growing so that two points separated by one unit of length at time
> t will be separated by two units of length at time t+1, for example:
>
> x(t)=x(0)*2^t y(t)=y(0)*2^t
>
> This is a simple toy universe with infinite past, future and spatial
> extent.

Ah, but Anders, doesn't this run into the mass limitations in the 'how
big is hell' essay I copied here recently???



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:59 MDT