Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sun Jul 29 2001 - 23:47:03 MDT

Next message: Michael M. Butler: "CORNBALL HUMOR: was Re: TECH: Jet powered beer coolers"
Previous message: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: TECH: Jet powered beer coolers"
In reply to: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 12:13 PM 7/29/01 -0400, Mike Lorrey wrote:

>In a properly libertarian society, any individual with
>the cash can buy or make a nuclear weapon, or any other weapon.

Bravo! A one-sentence pragmatic *reductio ad absurdum* of the concept of `a
properly libertarian society'.

Damien Broderick
[`The Right To Own Force-Shields Is The Right To Be Free!' -- A. E. van
Vogt, not.]

Next message: Michael M. Butler: "CORNBALL HUMOR: was Re: TECH: Jet powered beer coolers"
Previous message: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: TECH: Jet powered beer coolers"
In reply to: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Reply: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Property and the Law, and is it a priority?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:59 MDT