Re: Time - Crunch or Stretch? (was Re: Big Bang is Bunk)

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Sat Jul 28 2001 - 14:15:20 MDT

Next message: Pat Inniss: "Re: `capitalist' character values"
Previous message: Party of Citizens: "Re: regarding the YINYANG post on extropians"
In reply to: Reason: "RE: Time - Crunch or Stretch? (was Re: Big Bang is Bunk)"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Time - Crunch or Stretch? (was Re: Big Bang is Bunk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 12:58:08AM -0700, Reason wrote:
>
> ...not that we don't get to experience a subjective eternity in either case.
> It's a funny old world.

We better change it then.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y

Next message: Pat Inniss: "Re: `capitalist' character values"
Previous message: Party of Citizens: "Re: regarding the YINYANG post on extropians"
In reply to: Reason: "RE: Time - Crunch or Stretch? (was Re: Big Bang is Bunk)"
Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Time - Crunch or Stretch? (was Re: Big Bang is Bunk)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:58 MDT