Olga Bourlin wrote:
> From: "Alex F. Bokov" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > Libertarians don't favor
> > > > outlawing stupidity, but stupidity should have its costs.
> > It does, by definition, except when some do-gooder authority
> > decides to redistribute these costs and protect the stupid
> > from the consequences of their actions.
> I would rather deal with a do-gooder authority than a do-badder authority.
Disobey Acton's Law at your own peril. Government is only interested in
doing good for itself. If anyone else benefits, that is simple
serendipity, or a means to an end.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:58 MDT