From: Mike Lorrey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 24 July 2001 15:09
Subject: Re: capitalist religion (was: NANO: _Forbes_ cover story)
>Actually, hunter-gatherer groups ranged in size from family units up to
>extended clans, until large predators like sabre tigers, cave lions and
>cave bears were eliminated. While pecking orders did play a role in
>selecting leaders, leaders didn't dictate people lives, and unpopular
>leaders could be ousted.
Do you have a source for this? I don't mean a "this is how hunter-gatherers
live now so they must have lived this way in the paleolithic" one but one
from paleoanthropology. I ask because I am interested in this question but
find it hard to get serious analysis as opposed to mystical BS. Steve Davies
In such societies, few individuals could live
>without the technology in their lives, especially their weapons and
>clothing, and actually only a small percentage of protein came from
>large organized hunts. Most comes from individuals or pairs hunting
I seem to recall that in contemporary H-G societies it's the "gathering"
that is more important for the bulk of food supply, with hunting supplying
the (very important) marginal element. Steve D.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:55 MDT