> One of the things I really object to is the idea that
> rationality is somehow "incomplete", that there's
> something outside rationality that has the power to
> dictate whether I should be rational, rather than
> the other way around.
I completely agree. But despite your qualification
following the comma, some will invariably persist in
believing that you mean to demean emotion, intuition,
aesthetics, and anything else that is not rational.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:48 MDT