Re: Debunk All Religiosity Equally (D.A.R.E.)

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Thu Jul 12 2001 - 19:07:59 MDT


From: "Spike Jones" <spike66@attglobal.net>
> In principle, what is the real *difference* between the San Jose
> Mercury News and the National Inquirer? The New York Times
> and the NI? So why do we not get uptight with the NI for the
> silliness they "report", but expect these others to do otherwise?
> Inquiring minds want to know.

Well, the National Inquirer doesn't publish the Dow Jones or the Nasdaq
indices.
The NI apparently have some sense of probity they will not compromise.

> No theatre? Wow JR you must be waaaay out in the boonies. {8-] spike

This place is not even on the map.
(OK, there is one published map, but it's incorrect.)

Stay hungry,

--J. R.

Useless hypotheses, etc.:
 consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
analog computing, cultural relativism, GAC, CYC, and ELIZA

We won't move into a better future until we debunk religiosity, the most
regressive force now operating in society.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:44 MDT