Postal Tax on E-mail Hoax
Summary:
An e-mail is circulating throughout the Internet stating "Congressman Schnell"
has introduced "Bill 602P" allowing the U.S. Postal Service to levy a 5 cent
tax on e-mail. This e-mail rumor is completely false. In a press statement the
U.S. Postal Service explains, "A completely false rumor concerning the U.S.
Postal Service is being circulated on Internet e-mail. As a matter of fact,
the Postal Service has learned that a similar hoax occurred recently in Canada
concerning Canada Post." Similar postal tax e-mails may cite an editorial
appearing in the March 6, 1999, issue of The Washingtonian, this too is a
hoax.
More Information:
You can read about the postal tax on e-mail hoax, and other internet hoaxes,
at the U.S. Department of Energy Computer Incident Advisory Capability site.
More information on the e-mail tax hoax and other internet issues can be found
at:
Thomas, Legislative Information on the Internet, part of the Library Congress,
Frequently Asked Questions: What's this about legislation imposing a tax or
long distance telephone charge on internet access?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Natasha Vita-More" <natasha@natasha.cc>
To: <extropians@extropy.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 4:09 PM
Subject: Federal Bill 602p
>
> Does anyone know about this?
>
> "Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to
> bill  E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees".  Bill 602P will
> permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge  on  every
> e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source.  The
> consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
>
> "Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this
> legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost
> revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
> $230,000,000  in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad
> campaign:  "There is  nothing like a letter."  Since the average person
> received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in  1998,  the cost of the
> typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day  - or  over $180
> per year - above and beyond their regular Internet costs.  Note that this
> would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a  service they
> do not even provide.  The whole point of the Internet is democracy and
> non-interference. You  are  already paying an exorbitant price for snail
> mail because of bureaucratic  inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days
> for a letter to be  delivered  from coast to coast. If the US Postal
> Service is  allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the
> "free"  Internet in  the United States.  Congressional representative, Tony
> Schnell (R) has even suggested a  "$20-$40  per month surcharge on all
> Internet service" above and beyond the  governments  proposed E-mail
> charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have  ignored  the story
> the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the  idea of
> E-mail surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999
> Editorial). Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away!  Send this
> E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your friends and  relatives
> to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to  Bill  602P.
> It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be
> instrumental in killing a bill we do not want."
>
> Thanks,
> Natasha
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:39:42 MDT