>From: Dan Fabulich <dan@darkforge.cc.yale.edu>
> >
> > 2) That people are no more than cybernetic patterns.
> >
> > 3) That subjective experience either doesn't exist, or is
>unimportant
> > because it is some sort of ambient or peripheral effect.
I did not read all of this, but it seems to me that he concentrated his
refutation elsewhere than to the points #2 and #3 immediately above.
Of course that is where the real weakness in his counterarguments can be
found.
Did he even address these 2 points at all?
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:39:27 MDT