Emlyn wrote:
>
> > Your reasoning is based on a slow, soft Singularity, where both the
> > machines and humans converge, eventually resulting in an amalgamation,
> > advancing slowly enough so that virtually everybody can follow. While
> > it may happen that way, I don't think it to be likely. I would like to
> > hear some convincing arguments as to why you think I'm mistaken.
> >
>
> A singularity which is "slow"; can someone explain this to me?
>
Just that there is a more gentle ramp up to the Singularity versus a
relatively hard edge. The Singularity still is, well a Singularity.
-s.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:39:18 MDT