Adrian Tymes wrote:
(Excellent outline of how to actually succeed with a "dotcom" snipped)
> (Of course, for "product" you can substitute any source of financial
> profit. For instance, if you can think of a service that only you can
> provide - you having mastered the field through your research - then
> that would be an early-stage-useful target for your research.)
>
> The key here is not to do everything at once. Go for something you know
> you can do, then build on that, and you just might have a chance.
>
Absolutely; I agree. I think my point is that genetic programming may not
quite be the best place to start looking for a short term profit, perhaps
unless you are a current world leader in the field who has some really
knock-out idea. I'm not and I don't.
I do have a damned good idea in the teleworking arena, however. Any aussie
coders out there looking for the opportunity to telework to the US at some
point in the future, maybe interested in turning their careers in that
direction? Drop me a line privately.
Emlyn
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:38:12 MDT