Re: cities, databases parallel thread

From: David Lubkin (lubkin@unreasonable.com)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:23:48 MDT


On 9/13/00, at 3:38 AM, Emlyn O'Regan wrote:

>Yep, I agree. So what Spike would do, is his large, well structured data
>into Excel, then point Excel at it (it can do that I think) and go from
>there.

What Emlyn meant to say was: Put your data into Access, and then access
Access from Excel. Which has always been doable, and each successive
release makes easier. If you outgrow Access, move the data to SQL Server,
Oracle, or MySQL.

Also, be aware of what you can do with SAS, Darwin, or Mathematica.

IOW, have a rich toolbox. Store your data in a database. Analyze your
data with an analysis tool.

-- David Lubkin.

______________________________________________________________________________

lubkin@unreasonable.com || Unreasonable Software, Inc. || www.unreasonable.com
a trademark of USI:

> > > > > B e u n r e a s o n a b l e .
______________________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:45 MDT