Dan Fabulich wrote
> Chaitin's paper is at the same time much better and much worse than I
> was expecting.
snip
> The relationship to epistemology, though, looks rather weak to me.
Yes. Was just a speculation....
But it is interesting to point out
that a number of physicists take
Chaitin's theorems very seriously.
I.e. Cahill and Klinger are developing
a sort of pre-geometry
(self-reference, ge-bits, etc.)
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009023
scerir
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:41 MDT