----- Original Message -----
From: "Stirling Westrup" <sti@cam.org>
a Popperian falsificationist. To me, facts are predictive theories
> about outcomes of experiments which have been tested and have so far
> failed to be disproved. As far as I am concerned almost nothing matches
> your criteria for a fact, since nothing non-trivial can be proven true,
> and it is thus not a useful definition.
Well spoken. From what does Popperian falsificationism derive?
--::jason.joel.thompson:: ::founder::
www.wildghost.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:22 MDT