Re: SPACE: Radiation-Proof Bricks

From: E. Shaun Russell (e_shaun@uniserve.com)
Date: Mon Sep 04 2000 - 21:07:42 MDT


Daniel Ust wrote:

>You misunderstand the question. I'm arguing _for_ space colonization and
>_against_ planetary colonization. I tend to think of planets as traps. Why
>live at the bottom of a gravity well? It makes it harder to move about.

My apologies for my misunderstanding...I didn't notice the distinction you
were making between space travel itself and the colonization of planets.
If you are suggesting that we build "stations" as we go along, then I don't
see much of a problem with that. However, there are a lot of variables
which we will need to look out for. Planet dependence will be necessary
until we conquer the fuel and speed problems, not to mention having the
technology to build such stations as we go. Since the space program is
arguably behind other progressive technologies, I think that many of the
problems we envision with future space travel\colonization will be assisted
by AI and nanotech.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Shaun Russell | Extropian, Musician, ExI Member
e_shaun@uniserve.com | Owner of NWExtropians Group:
--------------------- http://www.eGroups.com/group/NWExtropians
*Editor of ExtroDot *Editor of TransDot
 http://www.extrodot.org http://www.transhuman.memetree.com
======================= ===================================
Hear my music at: http://www.mp3.com/eshaunrussell
Read my poetry at: http://www.therecord.net/e_shaun
-------------------------------------------------------------------
        <K I N E T I C I Z E Y O U R P O T E N T I A L>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:37:09 MDT